A commercial plan that knows
what moves it.
Tariffs, price actions, demand and freight, the plan is built on drivers tied to governing records, tracked against live actuals, and wired to the levers that close the gap.
The forecast is a spreadsheet, and the spreadsheet is a hostage negotiation.
Build the plan on drivers, not hope
Tariff exposure, supplier increases, freight, price actions, demand, each driver ties to a governing record and moves the plan when you toggle it. Scenarios are one click, not one weekend.
- Drivers tied to records: TAR-2026-09, PL-2026-03, FRT-Q4
- Base, shock and managed-response scenarios, instantly
- Revenue and pocket margin planned together
Variance that explains itself
Actuals land on the same spine the plan lives on, so every variance decomposes to its drivers automatically (price, volume, mix, cost) by segment, while the quarter is still open.
- Plan-vs-actual by segment, continuously
- Variance attributed to drivers, not debated in meetings
- Drift flagged mid-quarter, while it’s still fixable
| Segment | Plan Q2 | Actual | Var | Driver |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northeast Distribution | $18.2M | $17.6M | −3.3% | Price · mix |
| Midwest OEM | $12.4M | $12.9M | +4.0% | Volume |
| Southeast Contractor | $9.8M | $9.7M | −1.0% | On plan |
| National Accounts | $14.6M | $13.8M | −5.5% | Freight cost |
From plan gap to staged response
When the plan drifts, the response planner models the levers (list changes, freight recovery, corridor discipline) with guardrails on, and hands the chosen plan to governed execution.
- Levers modeled with live margin and volume impact
- Guardrails enforced in the model, not the retrospective
- The approved response becomes a price action, the loop closes
Plan, track, respond, one loop on one spine
The questions FP&A and commercial leaders ask first
Does this replace our FP&A tool or ERP planning module?
It replaces the commercial half of the spreadsheet: the revenue, price and margin plan built on drivers. Corporate consolidation stays where it is: Revomo feeds it a commercial plan that is actually connected to what the business is doing.
How is the forecast produced, is this a black box?
No. The plan is driver-based and every driver cites its record: the tariff schedule, the staged price action, the freight index. When the number moves, you can point at why, which is exactly what the board asks.
What makes this different from planning in spreadsheets, honestly?
Two things spreadsheets can’t do: actuals land automatically on the same records the plan was built from, and the response to a gap is staged in the same system that executes it. The loop closes instead of restarting every cycle.
Plan on drivers, not vibes.
Bring this year’s plan and last quarter’s miss. We’ll show you the drivers, the decomposition and the response.